For anyone who asks, we will not open source, but we may offer a licensed self-hosted version for a small yearly fee (maybe $10-20).
I've open sourced everything I've made in the past, and all that's happened is someone with more money picks up my project, outcompetes me, and drives me out of business. I dont want our hard work going to waste.
We have our own index, its not a shitshow of mixed results like Searx tends to be. this also means that we're not chasing breaking changes of some larger engine when they decide they dont want us, like Twitter did to Nitter, and Bing did to Searx.
We don't know how to monetize. Ads are the only option that we know of, donations do not work at all, as proven by my previous projects.
We've already got spam prevention and removal measures in place, but I won't discuss them.
We don't know how to scale it since its centralized by design and the frontend and backend are tightly integrated, largely because the frontend is largely generated on the fly by the backend. Maybe host a copy for each region we're aiming to acquire users from?
Our engine already understands 5 languages, and we hope to expand to CJK languages soon.
Lets be honest, its not much different from China. They both make social media companies censor, and they both track citizens to predict their likliness of committing a crime in the future.
Its not Google Sheets. It was initially generated with the tool because I like the formatting, but its HTML running on Cloudflare Pages. The source code is here
If you see errors or hwve suggestions, please submit an issue on GitHub, they're easier to track than here
You're not required to contribute. I went with GH because it doesn't require creating a new account on an obscure Git provider, which would kill the chwnces of anyone contributing.
I have worked for Status in the past, but that has not impacted the review of any apps. The spreadsheet has been reviewed thoroughly by others in the privacy space before I published it, and I encourage everyone to take a look and report any inaccuracies.
The criteria is objective on purpose. Everything on the spreadsheet can be verified for accuracy.
Status got a recommendation purely because it has proven itself to be resiliant to subpoenas and the cryptography is implemented well.
Nothing is sponsored, and no matter who I work for in the future, it won't impact the results. It's open source on GitHub, and I'm looking for contributors to decentralize control of the spreadsheets.
Mailing lists are for old fat unix guys. Who uses email anymore? I can't even remember the last time I opened my inbox, maybe a month ago for a 2FA code?
I'll stick with GitHub because its what I know. If you don't want to use GitHub, then you can still view the spreadsheet, just dont click the GitHub or Datasets links in the fop left.
The Bitcoiners were wrong: a blog post about privacy and bitcoin, and how they failed to design a cash alternative ( unfathom.ing )
We're building a search engine to compete with DuckDuckGo. No JS, no WASM, no spying. Just a statically generated results page.
We're (a group of friends) building a search engine from scratch to compete with DuckDuckGo. It still needs a name and logo....
Update: I made a spreadsheet that ranks messaging apps for privacy ( privacyspreadsheet.com )
I've been working hard on the privacy spreadsheet, which has been in development for over 150 hours now....
I made a spreadsheet that ranks messengers for privacy ( privacyspreadsheet.com )
I've been working really hard to research and rank messaging apps by their privacy. The more green boxes the better....
What Matrix/Discord/Teams alternatives are there that FULLY support E2EE across Desktop and Mobile?
Crosspost: https://feddit.de/post/8502102...