BlameThePeacock

@BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

BlameThePeacock ,

You can't ban LLMs at this point, they're too useful, it's impossible to track their use, they could be run anywhere on the globe, and even open source models that you can run locally exist.

The cat is out of the bag as they say.

BlameThePeacock ,

It's an opinion, but it's hardly valid. It's a knee-jerk fear reaction to something new.

People had the same opinion about computers, cellphones, even electricity...

BlameThePeacock ,

That's not what that term means...

BlameThePeacock ,
  1. No they aren't. They're saving me multiple hours a week at my job. They're a productivity multiplier for many tasks even in their current early state.

  2. If you don't think every single cellphone manufacturer isn't trying to jam a local model into their newest devices, I've got a bridge to sell you.

BlameThePeacock ,

VALID - (of an argument or point) having a sound basis in logic or fact; reasonable or cogent.

No, not all opinions are valid.

BlameThePeacock ,

Not even Urban Dictionary has a definition for "Too big to fail" that applies here, and it's got one about taking a shit.

BlameThePeacock ,

You can have an opinion that is grounded in basis of logic or fact.

In my opinion, the sunset appears pinky/purple. The basic foundation of this opinion (which others may disagree with due to slight variations in atmospheric conditions) is still rooted in fact. Someone else may think it looks red/purple. Both are basically correct, reasonably speaking.

BlameThePeacock ,

It's "taking the piss"

Amd it has nothing to do with urine consumption...

BlameThePeacock ,

The C rating can absolutely still be used when talking about recharging, it's just usually less relevant.

BlameThePeacock ,

There are materials possible that will completely change the world.

Theres probably a room temperature superconductor for example.

The number of possibilities is effectively infinite though, since its not just which atoms, but also how they're arranged.

Can somebody explain why game makers don't start their own companies together?

It seems like every other week a game studio is massively laying off employees; sometimes after years of development. What I'm reading is that it's a quick way to lower expenses and pad the investors' pockets, flooding the market with developers and reducing their value, to then hire them back a few months later at lower...

BlameThePeacock ,

That's exactly what will happen.

A lot of new studios will form out of the ashes of these layoffs.

That's why you often see "from the former developers of X game" or similar in marketing for new games.

BlameThePeacock ,

I use it all the time to write Microsoft Excel and Microsoft PowerApps formulas. I use it to draft and re-write e-mails. I use it to come up with ideas and brainstorm.

BlameThePeacock ,

I just use Chat-GPT, I also have the capability to write my own formulas, but especially for more complex or repetitive formulas it's faster.

Here's one for PowerApps I asked it to extend

Patch(Timesheets, LookUp(Timesheeets, ID=SharePointIntegration.SelectedListItemID), {DataString:Concatenate(TextInput1.Text, ";",TextInput2.Text, ";", TextInput3.Text, ";", TextInput1_1.Text, ";",TextInput2_1.Text, ";", TextInput3_1.Text, ";", TextInput1_2.Text, ";",TextInput2_2.Text, ";", TextInput3_2.Text, ";", TextInput1_3.Text, ";",TextInput2_3.Text, ";", TextInput3_3.Text, ";", TextInput1_4.Text, ";",TextInput2_4.Text, ";", TextInput3_4.Text, ";", TextInput1_5.Text, ";",TextInput2_5.Text, ";", TextInput3_5.Text, ";", TextInput1_6.Text, ";",TextInput2_6.Text, ";", TextInput3_6.Text, ";")});
Refresh('Timesheets');

I just gave it the first bit and two text input fields initially and then asked it to add the remainder for me instead of hitting copy paste and changing the numbers a dozen times.

Probably saved me 5 minutes, but I do this kind of thing fairly regularly so it's probably saving me a half-hour to an hour per week on formulas alone.

BlameThePeacock ,

This game has been amazing, various alpha versions we're often different enough to feel like entirely new games.

Definitely worth what I paid for it.

BlameThePeacock ,

Boston Dynamics' videos seem to make us disbelieve a lot, but so far it's all been real.

BlameThePeacock ,

Or it's just to show off the joint rotational abilities the thing is capable of compared to the hydraulic limitations that were part of Atlas.

Or both...

BlameThePeacock ,

The word you're looking for is adoption, not adaptation.

BlameThePeacock ,

This is exactly what I expected to happen, it's taking a bit longer than I thought, but that's not surprising.

BlameThePeacock ,

For the first bit, sure, but it won't stay that way for long. The price of these vehicles is dropping, and the price of humans is going up.

BlameThePeacock ,

This is such a common misconception, if companies never passed savings on to us, we'd be paying absolutely astronomical prices and you couldn't afford to buy anything at all.

Shirts used to be hundreds/thousands of dollars or days/weeks of your own time, a lot of people had to weave their own fabric and make their own clothes because they never earned enough money to afford to buy one pre-made since all their work went into feeding themselves. Average people didn't own more than a handful of sets of clothes up until the industrial revolution. Almost all of the benefits of automation in fabric production has all been passed down to you.

You can now pick up a t-shirt from Walmart for $5, or a dress shirt for $50 both of which are far higher quality than what used to exist.

Profit margins for most consumer goods industries are not that high usually around 50% from creation to consumer (split between the manufacturer, wholesaler, and retailer) and some industries are much lower even than that.

BlameThePeacock ,

Parts of the USA never had self-scanning due to theft concerns.

Now there are stores that are pulling out of specific neighborhoods due to theft even with a cashier in place.

https://www.businessinsider.com/walmart-ceo-stores-will-close-if-theft-at-retailer-doesnt-decline-2022-12#:~:text=Walmart%20CEO%20warns%20company%20will,theft%20doesn't%20slow%20down&text=He%20said%20that%20along%20with,billion%20in%20theft%20each%20year.

BlameThePeacock ,

Self-driving vehicles are not only here to solve food delivery.

In the US, the average American spends about 365 hours a year driving, about an hour a day.

I'd much rather use that time to work, read a book, or a dozen other activities. It's over 6% of my waking hours.

BlameThePeacock ,

There are at least 3 different app based food delivery companies (uber eats, skip the dishes, door dash) in the city near me, on top of the fact that a lot of places have their own dedicated delivery people (Grocery stores, pizza, even liquor stores)

There's clearly a competitive market in this space.

BlameThePeacock ,

Shirts were automated 33 years ago too. I was comparing them to pre industrial revolution clothing which was heavy and itchy.

As for Nordstrom, those are luxury goods not consumer goods. You're paying for brand names or fancy fabrics, neither of which are necessary to your life.

BlameThePeacock ,

Enterprises, sure.

Homes? Why? I can't even find a good use for a single gigabit download for personal use. Being able to download a new game in 3 minutes rather than 5 isn't something I'm willing to pay additional money every month to get. Remote desktops, video streaming, gaming, there's nothing uses that much bandwidth even in my household of 5 people.

BlameThePeacock ,

I will literally build my own printer before ever subscribing to this bullshit.

Go fuck yourself hp, you are not as important as you think you are.

BlameThePeacock ,

Anonymous from who? None of what you've mentioned will keep the police out for long if you're doing things that catch their attention.

ajsadauskas , to Technology
@ajsadauskas@aus.social avatar

Dude, where's my self-driving car?

A good look at The Verge about the history of false claims made by the Silicon Valley hype machine around self-driving cars:

"In 2015, the then-lead of Google’s self-driving car project Chris Urmson said one of his goals in developing a fully driverless vehicle was to make sure that his 11-year-old son would never need a driver’s license.

"The subtext was that in five years, when Urmson’s son turned 16, self-driving cars would be so ubiquitous, and the technology would be so superior to human driving, that his teenage son would have no need nor desire to learn to drive himself.

"Well, it’s 2024, and Urmson’s son is now 20 years old. Any bets on whether he got that driver’s license?"

https://www.theverge.com/24065447/self-driving-car-autonomous-tesla-gm-baidu

@technology

BlameThePeacock ,

There are autonomous cars on the road right now driving people around without anyone in the front seat. The article even admits this.

This entire article is just complaining that it's happening slower than predicted as companies refine the technology, like that's somehow a bad thing.

It's still happening.

BlameThePeacock ,

During testing, sure... That's not going to be the long term value.

BlameThePeacock ,

It isn't though, nowhere is it asking when, it's just complaining it isn't here yet.

BlameThePeacock ,

The equipment required to "make" a motherboard is orders of magnitude more expensive than anything you could afford.

There's a reason why it's all custom designed and there's only a handful of board manufacturers in the entire world, most laptop companies don't even have their own fabrication for these pieces, they just do the design and final assembly.

BlameThePeacock ,

Another idiot writer missing how AI works... along with every other automation and productivity increase.

I literally automate jobs for a living.

My job isn't to eliminate the role of every staff member in a department, it's to take the headcount from 40 to 20 while having the remaining 20 be able to produce the same results. I've successfully done this dozens of times in my careers, and generative AI is now just another tool we can use to get that number down a little bit lower or more easily than we could before.

Will I be able to take a unit of 2 people down to 0 people? No, I've never seen a process where I could eliminate every human.

BlameThePeacock ,

I've been following Doctorow for decades now (BoingBoing) and yes, he's an idiot in this situation.

I'm still working with the organizations I started automating for more than a decade ago. I'm sitting in the office of one of them right now. It's worked out great, nobody is complaining about the fact that this office space now has people at separated desks instead of crunched together like they were when I started. If it makes you feel any better, I almost exclusively do this for government and public organizations (I'm at a post-secondary education institution right now) though I really don't care.

Stopping or stalling productivity improvements is stupid, that job is effectively useless if it can be automated, it's nothing more than make-work to keep it. We should pass laws to redistribute wealth to solve that problem, not keep them in useless jobs by preventing automation.

BlameThePeacock ,

No, I have worked with a dozen or so organizations, but I've done multiple jobs for each. I'm a freelancer.

As for your second question, I'd like to see a basic income implemented for all citizens in my country. I've talked to my local politicians about it multiple times. It's something that people now know about, which is good progress in my opinion. I don't expect it to happen soon, but hopefully we'll get there before we start to have too many social problems.

BlameThePeacock ,

Anecdote are not statistics.

Head counts increasing at one company are often offset by losses from their competitors as they take market share due to increased productivity.

The number of auto mechanics went up as the number of horse ranchers went down.

BlameThePeacock ,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXxrmussq4E

Have you not been paying attention to robotics recently? Opening doors is a solved problem with consumer grade hardware and software at this point.

BlameThePeacock ,

It’s stolen in the fact that these people are using Image-2-Image generative AI. That means that his original image is directly used as an input to make the resulting pictures, which then compete against his original image for attention on the internet. Fewer people will then see his original, and perhaps purchase one of his carvings.

Is it “real” theft? No Does it harm him? Yes

It’s a very tricky situation, given that there’s no way to stop it. We cannot shove this back into Pandora’s box. Even if you made it illegal, it would be almost impossible to enforce in a court because of the lack of jurisdiction across borders.

I suspect our culture is about to see a seismic shift again, I just don’t know how yet.

BlameThePeacock ,

Harmless games, also bought and shut down by Sony.

BlameThePeacock ,

Factorio’s expansion looks to be just as good as Factorio.

96% positive all time reviews, and 98% recent reviews…

It’s no wonder I have thousands of hours in this game, the devs and community are geniuses.

BlameThePeacock ,

I’m pretty heavily in favour of the Microsoft 365 platform, but loop has not found a spot in my toolkit at this point. I’d rather just use OneNote.

I get that these tools are supposed to make collaboration easier, but it really doesn’t add much in my opinion.

BlameThePeacock ,

While there are some frustrating parts I’ve found that it gets the job done reasonably well and integrates well across the products. I’m a power user so I can often find workarounds for even the things that bother me. Teams communicates well, sharepoint stores the files for my group just fine, office does what it always does, then I get these other useful tools for forms, databases, video sharing, etc.

I think the biggest problem for most people is that they never received adequate training. I trained myself so I skipped that limitation.

BlameThePeacock ,

MAC addresses are per network Interface, my computer has three technically and uses two of them on a regular basis.

A terrible tracking method.

BlameThePeacock ,

It’s a little more expensive, but most places can find the space by drilling straight down. Still worth it from what I’ve seen in most places.

Google says AI systems should be able to mine publishers’ work unless companies opt out, turning copyright law on its head ( www.theguardian.com )

In its submission to the Australian government’s review of the regulatory framework around AI, Google said that copyright law should be altered to allow for generative AI systems to scrape the internet.

BlameThePeacock ,

Jackson Pollock didn’t create paintings, Jackson Pollock’s art was story telling and showmanship.

Yes, in order to learn a spoken language you have to have heard it. However, languages evolve over time. You develop regional accents and dialects. All of the UK speaks English but no two towns speak the same way.

Just like different models have their own patterns of writing…

You’re thinking about LLMs like they’re equivalent to multiple people(or groups of people) but each LLM is equivalent to a single person. The training and resulting function of each one is as distinct as an individual human.

I could raise one of my children to perform the exact same functions as an LLM or art creation tool. Give them exactly the same image/text sets that these models are trained on, and have them practice for a decade or two. Then I could tell them “Hey I need a picture of an orange rabbit riding a bike” and they could draw me one, or write a story about the same topic. There’s clearly no copyright infringement in that process, so why would it be different for creating a machine to do the same thing?

BlameThePeacock ,

You’re missing the training even a child has received to reach the state where they could do that. If you raised a child to 5 years completely by themselves in an empty room they wouldn’t be able to draw anything at all, let alone something based on pictures. The act of drawing a variation on a bunny from a picture requires they learn and practice fine motor skills, and it requires them to have an understanding of animals.

Humans get literally 150,000+ hours of training time before we even let them try to become an adult.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • All magazines